Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Authorship misconduct.
We read the publication by Liu (2016) on authorship misconduct with a great interest. In fact, the authorship misconduct is no uncommon and has to be managed. Liu (2016) noted that “Proper authorship embodies honesty, integrity, fairness and transparency, which surely are the very essence of any scientific pursuit.” Due to the present requirement on academic publication to support academic rank...
متن کاملFindings of Misconduct in Science/Research Misconduct
All Atomic Weapons Employer employees who worked in any building at the Wah Chang facility in Albany, Oregon, for the operational period from January 1, 1971 through December 31, 1972, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of empl...
متن کاملFindings of Misconduct in Science/Research Misconduct
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: When submitting comments or requesting information, please include the OMB control number 4040–0001 and document identifier HHS–EGOV– 18380–30D for reference. Information Collection Request Title: SF–424 Research & Related (R&R). OMB No.: 4040–0001. Abstract: The SF–424 Research & Related Information Collection is an information collection comprised of a set of standa...
متن کاملFindings of Misconduct in Science
case studies to two children’s disorders that appear to have environmental etiologies but are less well understood: disorders of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism and attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A discussion will follow each case study presentation to consider the opportunities, the barriers and the design challenges that confront future clinical, toxicological, epidemiolo...
متن کاملFindings of Misconduct in Science
To protect the Government’s interest and to ensure timely delivery of items of the requisite quality, contracting officers, prior to award, must make an affirmative determination that the prospective contractor is responsible, i.e., capable of performing the contract. Before making such a determination, the contracting officer must have in his possession or must obtain information sufficient to...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Science and Engineering Ethics
سال: 2019
ISSN: 1353-3452,1471-5546
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-019-00112-4